COLUMN: Please, someone tell Brett Yormark that expanding the NCAA tournament is an awful idea

MORGANTOWN There should be no doubt that Brett Yormark isnt the right guy to have in charge of the Big 12 Conference.

Outside of not making a real push to get Gonzaga into the league as a basketball member, every move Yormarks made has gone well beyond simply stabilizing the Big 12.

Yet, when it comes to the NCAA mens basketball tournament, someone needs to tell Yormark to stay on the sidelines.

Im in favor of expansion to 76, Yormark said, as the Big 12 mens tournament was getting underway at the T-Mobile Center in Kansas City, Mo.

I think thats the right number.

Mr.

Yormark, your right number couldnt be more off the mark.

To be fair, Yormark is not alone in the boat for expansion.

Thats been the speculation ever since 2016, when the NCAA extended its contract with CBS and Turner Broadcasting to televise the tournament through 2032.

That extension, by the way, was worth $8 billion to the NCAA and its member schools.

And we do live in a time when the major TV networks and streaming services are dishing out a kings ransom for the right to broadcast live sports.

Or maybe you didnt hear about the 11-year, $76 billion deal the NBA recently signed with ESPN/ABC, NBC and Amazon that begins next season.

So, I totally get what Yormark is putting out there.

Expanding the tournament to 76 teams would essentially mean eight play-in games rather than the current four.

Thats four extra games for either CBS or one of the Turner networks to televise with the idea that those games would bring in extra money to spread out to the schools on top of the $8 billion.

It truly makes sense, except theres one giant problem that Yormark and any other Power Five commissioner who agrees with him isnt thinking of: You guys dont have a good enough product to sell for expansion.

The NBA has LeBron James and Kevin Durant.

The NFL has the most popular live-sports product on the planet.

The popularity that comes with college football makes all the sense in the world as to why ESPN would pay $7.8 billion over six years to televise the College Football Playoff, not to mention the other billions it shells out to the major conferences to broadcast regular-season games.

Yes, the NCAA mens basketball tournament is March Madness as an overall brand.

There was a time when that overall brand was good enough to captivate national attention.

Maybe it still does to a degree, but the individual products that make up that overall brand mens college hoops teams are watered down and severely diluted from what they once were.

Well give you an example.

If this years tournament was expanded to 76 teams, one of those extra games you might be able to watch would be Boise State vs.

Wake Forest.

Its a near guarantee you cant name a single player from either one of those teams.

Theres about a 90% chance you couldnt name the head coach at either one of those schools.

OK, well ask you an easier one: Who is the leading scorer in all of college basketball right now? That shouldnt be difficult at all, but its likely that only fans who focus on Big East basketball know the answer is Villanovas Eric Dixon.

There are two major problems with the mens college basketball product.

The first is a combination of the one-and-done rule and rampant transferring.

Players come and go, and rosters have to be rebuilt almost from scratch every season.

Im not arguing the athletes shouldnt have that right, but it does come at a cost.

Which leads to the second problem.

There are ma and pa restaurants out there with better marketing strategies than whats provided for mens college basketball.

Conferences attempt to care about marketing their teams and players through preseason media days that arent very well attended anymore.

National sports talk shows rarely mention college basketball until the conference tournaments begin.

ESPNs version of College Gameday for college basketball is a joke compared to its football brethren.

Its basically left up to each individual school to market their teams and players, and, well, most schools out there dont offer up the level of access to the media they once did.

It all adds up to one major identity problem, as in mens college hoops really has no national identity.

Sure, you watch and follow the home team, but the executives at those TV networks who Yormark and Co.

want to squeeze more money out of need you to do more than watch the home team.

Otherwise, what exactly would they be paying for? So, Mr.

Yormark, we urge you to stop this nonsense of expanding the NCAA tournament.

While you may be seeing dollar signs, someone needs to tell you that you are blinded to the possibility of killing off the true spirit of March Madness..

This article has been shared from the original article on dominionpost, here is the link to the original article:

https://www.dominionpost.com/2025/03/14/column-please-someone-tell-brett-yormark-that-expanding-the-ncaa-tournament-is-an-awful-idea/