Why a Lottery Decides the Fate of Cooper Flagg and the Mavericks

The Dallas Mavericks won the NBA lottery Monday night by securing the first overall pick in the 2025 NBA draft and the chance to draft Cooper Flagg, the NBAs most heralded prospect since LeBron James was selected first overall in the 2003 NBA Draft.Once again, an NBA teams fortunes for the next decade or so turned on the sequence of ping pong balls generated by a lottery machine.

The San Antonio Spurs came close to landing Flagg, securing the second overall pick based on the lottery balls, but will instead have to identify the best of the rest.More from Sportico.comDallas Nabs No.

1 Pick in Cooper Flagg-Led 2025 NBA DraftMichael Jordan's NASCAR Suit May Hit the Skids After Latest HearingATP Tour Can't Threaten Players in Antitrust Suit, Judge SaysIt can be rightfully asked why such a franchise-altering event is determined by a lottery.

There is no league more fixated on data, analytics and algorithms than the NBA.

Teams invest massive resources in hiring talented and data-driven basketball operations staff in hopes of outsmarting each other.

Yet the player thought to be the next great one is going to a team because it won a lottery, by definition a random process.There are other ways Flagg could enter the NBA.

Like in the NFL, the first pick could be awarded to the team with the worst regular season record (the Utah Jazz).

From 1966 to 1984, the NBA used a variant of that approach by having the team with the worst record in each conference flip a coin.

The league moved away from the use of records because of concerns it incentivized teams to tank.

To that point, in 1982, then-Clippers owner Donald Sterling was recorded as saying, Maybe I have to lose the battle to win the war, we must end last to draw first to get a franchise-maker.

Although the current lottery is weighted to favor the team with the worst-record and is limited only to the 14 teams that failed to make the playoffs, the lotterys outcome remains a mystery until it is revealed.

In other words, an NBA team losing this past season didnt guarantee it the chance to draft Flagg.

San Antonio and Philadelphia, meanwhile, now hold the numer two and three picks in the upcoming draft, while teams accused of tanking to lower their position fared far worse in the lottery.

A more radical approach would be to eliminate the draft altogether.

Flagg could sign with the team with whom he most wishes to sign.

Hes from Maine, so maybe hed want to sign with the Boston Celtics.

Or maybe Flagg wants to team up with James and Luka Doncic in Los Angeles.

Or if hes liked living in North Carolina over the last year, the Charlotte Hornets are right there.That sounds radical from a sports perspective, yet it captures 99.9% of employment in the United States.

Employers in other industries dont draft college students, nor are bad employers rewarded with the best college prospects.

The valedictorians of MIT, Princeton, Stanford and similarly prestigious schoolsincluding Duke, where Flaggs freshman classmates will enter the job market in a few yearsarent assigned to the worst companies in America.

That idea sounds nonsensical because it is.

If a company is struggling, it goes out of business.

Its not rewarded.Yet major sports leagues use drafts because they help to ensure that every team has a legitimate chance to succeed.

That, in turn, retains and grows fan bases, boosts TV ratings and ultimately generates more revenue for the league.

It might not be fair to Flagg that hes denied the chance to pick his employer, but the logic is that the league is healthier if a weaker teams fortunes are boosted with Flagg and other top prospects.

Even when a fans team is bad, there is hope that everything will change with the draft.

That hope might keep that person a fan of a team and not turn their attention and dollars to some other form of entertainment.Drafts in the major pro leagues are also legal, even if theyre unabashedly anti-competitive.

A draft overtly restrains the labor market by preventing both a player from signing with a preferred employer and getting multiple employers (teams) to bid for him or her.

If subject to antitrust scrutiny, a draft would be deeply problematic because it impedes choice and price fixes.Except its not subject to antitrust scrutiny.

A league and a players association negotiate the draft as a term of employment in a collective bargaining agreement.

A draft is thus insulated by the non-statutory labor exemption, which embodies a series of U.S.

Supreme Court rulings that instruct when management and labor collectively bargain pay, wages and other employment conditions, those conditions are exempt from antitrust scrutiny.

Federal courts have blessed drafts as a result.That is true for the NBA, which saw its draft challenged in the early 1980s.

Leon Wood, a Philadelphia 76ers first round pick out of Cal-State Fullerton who later became an NBA referee, made the case against the draft.

But Wood lost because the NBA and players association had negotiated the draft.

The same legal point applies to rookie wage scales.

Even though those scales adversely impact new players, new players are still subject to the conditions negotiated by their union with the league.Even players who, by virtue of an eligibility rule, are barred from being part of the union have been held subject to unions negotiations with leagues.

I know this personally, having served as an attorney for Ohio State star running back Maurice Clarett in his antitrust challenge against the NFL and its eligibility rule requiring that players be three years out of high school.

So Flagg doesnt have a say on where hes picked, and that is legal.

It might not be a great system, but its arguably the best for the league as a whole.Best of Sportico.comCollege Athletes as Employees: Answering 25 Key QuestionsSign up for Sportico's Newsletter.

For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram..

This article has been shared from the original article on yahoo, here is the link to the original article.