Goaltending
GOALTENDER
Jet Greaves
#73 | Goaltender@
GOALTENDER
Mikhail Sergachev
#98 | Defense| Player | W-L-OTL | GAA | SV% | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jet Greaves | None-None | 1.97 | 0.926 | -- |
| Mikhail Sergachev | None-None | -- | -- | -- |
None-None
W-L-OTL
None-None
1.97
GAA
--
0.926
Save %
--
--
SO
--
AI Model Win Probability
BLUE JACKETS
100%
MAMMOTH
0%
BLUE JACKETS
--
MAMMOTH
--
AI Model Projected Total
AI Projection
7.0
Projected
Book Total
--
Over / Under Line
Over 0
0%
Under 0
100%
AI Model Spread Expectation
AI Spread Proj
-1.0
UTAH
Book Spread
--
Book Line
▲ Edge: +1.0 points (Utah)
Spread Distribution
AI Model
+6+4+20-2-4-6
Distribution centered around UTA -1.0 expected margin.
Margin of Victory (UTA)
CBJ By 1 goal
12.1%
CBJ By 2-3 goals
9.3%
UTA By 1 goal
19.7%
UTA By 2-3 goals
29.6%
AI Model Projected Score
Columbus
3
COLUMBUS
Utah
4
UTAH
Simulated Score
Columbus
2
COLUMBUS
Utah
3
UTAH
Projections Grades
Moneyline (ML)
Agreement
AI
Mammoth
Loss
0% Win Prob
D
Sim
Mammoth
Loss
50% Win Prob
B
Puck Line (ATS)
Agreement
AI
Mammoth (+1.5)
Win
Proj Goals: -1.0
D
Sim
Mammoth (+0)
Loss
Proj Goals: -1.0
B
Over/Under (Total)
No Consensus
AI
o6.5
Loss
Proj Total: 7.0
D
Sim
u6.5
Win
Proj Total: 5.0
B
Head-to-Head History
Date
Game
Score
Oct 3, 2026
UTA @ CBJ
4 - 1
Mar 7, 2026
UTA @ CBJ
5 - 4
Jan 11, 2026
CBJ @ UTA
3 - 2
Feb 6, 2025
UTA @ CBJ
3 - 2
Jan 31, 2025
CBJ @ UTA
3 - 2
Key Model Drivers
Takeaways (L5)
+35.7% more
Utah: 5.2
vs
Columbus: 3.8
Power Play % (L5)
+14.4%
Utah: 15.4%
vs
Columbus: 1.0%
Shots on Goal (L5)
+16.8% more
Columbus: 29.3
vs
Utah: 24.4
Blocked Shots (L5)
+14.0% more
Columbus: 16.9
vs
Utah: 14.6
Post-Mortem Analysis
Metric
Projected
Actual
Score Game
CBJ Score
3.0
3
UTA Score
4.0
2
Team Stats Splits (Home / Away)
Blocked Shots
14.6 / 16.9
21.0 / 23.0
Faceoff %
49.9 / 52.7
52.1 / 47.9
Hits
17.8 / 20.7
15.0 / 18.0
Power Play %
15.4 / 1.0
0.0 / 66.7
Shots on Goal
24.4 / 29.3
27.0 / 36.0
Takeaways
5.2 / 3.8
5.0 / 2.0
Public Market Splits
Moneyline
Open: --
→
--
Spread (ATS)
Open: --
→
--
Total (O/U)
Open: --
→
--
Season to Date Model Accuracy
AI Model
SIM Engine
UTA
CBJ
UTA
CBJ
ML
50%
2-2
50%
1-1
75%
3-1
100%
2-0
ATS
50%
2-2
50%
1-1
50%
2-2
50%
1-1
TTL
75%
3-1
50%
1-1
75%
3-1
0%
0-2