AI Model Win Probability
RIVER HAWKS
100%
BEARCATS
0%
RIVER HAWKS
--
BEARCATS
--
AI Model Projected Total
AI Projection
109.0
Projected
Book Total
--
Over / Under Line
Over 0
100%
Under 0
0%
AI Model Spread Expectation
AI Spread Proj
-11.0
BINGHAMTON
Book Spread
--
Book Line
▲ Edge: +11.0 points (Binghamton)
Spread Distribution
AI Model
+30+20+100-10-20-30
Distribution centered around BING -11.0 expected margin.
Margin of Victory (BING)
UML By 1-7 points
9.3%
UML By 8-14 points
2.7%
BING By 1-7 points
21.6%
BING By 8-14 points
27.4%
AI Model Projected Score
UMass Lowell
49
UMASS LOWELL
Binghamton
60
BINGHAMTON
Simulated Score
UMass Lowell
68
UMASS LOWELL
Binghamton
72
BINGHAMTON
Projections Grades
Moneyline (ML)
Agreement
AI
Bearcats
Loss
0% Win Prob
D
Sim
Bearcats
Loss
50% Win Prob
D
Point Spread (ATS)
Agreement
AI
Bearcats (+6)
Win
Proj Spread: -11.0
D
Sim
Bearcats (+0)
Loss
Proj Spread: -4.0
D
Over/Under (Total)
No Consensus
AI
u147.0
Win
Proj Total: 109.0
D
Sim
u147.0
Win
Proj Total: 140.0
D
Head-to-Head History
Date
Game
Score
Feb 21, 2026
BING @ UML
79 - 92
Jan 10, 2026
UML @ BING
73 - 68
Mar 1, 2025
BING @ UML
53 - 79
Feb 6, 2025
UML @ BING
54 - 66
Feb 22, 2024
BING @ UML
80 - 87
Key Model Drivers
Free Throw % (L5)
+9.7%
Binghamton: 73.3%
vs
UMass Lowell: 63.6%
Rebounding (L5)
+20.8% more
UMass Lowell: 36.1
vs
Binghamton: 28.6
Assists (L5)
+8.8% more
UMass Lowell: 12.2
vs
Binghamton: 11.1
Field Goal % (L5)
+6.1%
UMass Lowell: 50.6%
vs
Binghamton: 44.5%
Post-Mortem Analysis
Metric
Projected
Actual
Score Game
UML Score
49.0
73
BING Score
60.0
68
Team Stats Splits (Home / Away)
3pt Field Goal %
32.7 / 36.5
36.0 / 44.0
Assists
11.1 / 12.2
11.0 / 9.0
Blocks
3.3 / 3.5
4.0 / 5.0
Field Goal %
44.5 / 50.6
46.0 / 47.0
Free Throw %
73.3 / 63.6
68.0 / 67.0
Rebounding
28.6 / 36.1
32.0 / 31.0
Steals
5.5 / 5.9
6.0 / 8.0
Turnovers
11.5 / 11.7
13.0 / 11.0
Public Market Splits
Moneyline
Open: --
→
--
Public splits unavailable
Spread (ATS)
Open: --
→
--
Public splits unavailable
Total (O/U)
Open: --
→
--
Public splits unavailable
Situational Trends
📊 Win-Loss
UML
Advantage
15-18-0
(45.5%)
Margin: -1.4
ATS +/-: -0.3
BING
8-23-0
(25.8%)
Margin: -7.0
ATS +/-: -1.7
🎯 ATS (Spread)
UML
Advantage
16-14-0
(53.3%)
Margin: -1.4
ATS +/-: -0.3
BING
14-13-0
(51.8%)
Margin: -7.0
ATS +/-: -1.7
⚖️ Over/Under
UML
14-15-1
O: 48.3% / U: 51.7%
Total +/-: +1.2
BING
15-12-0
O: 55.6% / U: 44.4%
Total +/-: +5.2
Season to Date Model Accuracy
AI Model
SIM Engine
BING
UML
BING
UML
ML
67%
20-10
70%
23-10
57%
17-13
58%
19-14
ATS
73%
22-8
70%
23-10
57%
17-13
58%
19-14
TTL
70%
21-9
58%
19-14
100%
30-0
100%
33-0