Goaltending
GOALTENDER
Devin Cooley
#1 | Goaltender@
GOALTENDER
Karel Vejmelka
#70 | Goaltender| Player | W-L-OTL | GAA | SV% | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Cooley | None-None | 2.04 | 0.935 | -- |
| Karel Vejmelka | None-None | 1.01 | 0.950 | -- |
None-None
W-L-OTL
None-None
2.04
GAA
Ldr 1.01
0.935
Save %
Ldr 0.950
--
SO
--
AI Model Win Probability
FLAMES
100%
MAMMOTH
0%
FLAMES
--
MAMMOTH
--
AI Model Projected Total
AI Projection
7.0
Projected
Book Total
--
Over / Under Line
Over 0
0%
Under 0
100%
AI Model Spread Expectation
AI Spread Proj
-1.0
UTAH
Book Spread
--
Book Line
▲ Edge: +1.0 points (Utah)
Spread Distribution
AI Model
+6+4+20-2-4-6
Distribution centered around UTA -1.0 expected margin.
Margin of Victory (UTA)
CGY By 1 goal
12.1%
CGY By 2-3 goals
9.3%
UTA By 1 goal
19.7%
UTA By 2-3 goals
29.6%
AI Model Projected Score
Calgary
3
CALGARY
Utah
4
UTAH
Simulated Score
Calgary
4
CALGARY
Utah
3
UTAH
Projections Grades
Moneyline (ML)
Divergence
AI
Mammoth
Win
0% Win Prob
D
Sim
Flames
Loss
50% Win Prob
B
Puck Line (ATS)
Divergence
AI
Mammoth (+0)
Win
Proj Goals: -1.0
D
Sim
Flames (-0)
Loss
Proj Goals: -1.0
B
Over/Under (Total)
No Consensus
AI
o0
Win
Proj Total: 7.0
D
Sim
u0.0
Win
Proj Total: 7.0
B
Head-to-Head History
Date
Game
Score
Apr 12, 2026
UTA @ CGY
1 - 4
Dec 6, 2025
UTA @ CGY
0 - 2
Oct 15, 2025
CGY @ UTA
1 - 3
Apr 1, 2025
CGY @ UTA
1 - 3
Jan 2, 2025
UTA @ CGY
5 - 3
Key Model Drivers
Power Play % (L5)
+4.2%
Utah: 15.6%
vs
Calgary: 11.5%
Takeaways (L5)
+48.8% more
Calgary: 5.1
vs
Utah: 2.6
Hits (L5)
+27.7% more
Calgary: 24.7
vs
Utah: 17.9
Blocked Shots (L5)
+25.9% more
Calgary: 16.7
vs
Utah: 12.3
Post-Mortem Analysis
Metric
Projected
Actual
Score Game
CGY Score
3.0
1
UTA Score
4.0
3
Team Stats Splits (Home / Away)
Blocked Shots
12.3 / 16.7
17.0 / 14.0
Faceoff %
46.7 / 47.1
43.4 / 56.6
Hits
17.9 / 24.7
25.0 / 21.0
Power Play %
15.6 / 11.5
0.0 / 25.0
Shots on Goal
26.6 / 25.7
32.0 / 20.0
Takeaways
2.6 / 5.1
2.0 / 5.0
Public Market Splits
Moneyline
Open: --
→
--
Spread (ATS)
Open: --
→
--
Total (O/U)
Open: --
→
--
Season to Date Model Accuracy
AI Model
SIM Engine
UTA
CGY
UTA
CGY
ML
60%
3-2
50%
2-2
60%
3-2
25%
1-3
ATS
60%
3-2
50%
2-2
60%
3-2
25%
1-3
TTL
60%
3-2
50%
2-2
80%
4-1
25%
1-3