sportingnews
The natural grass surface installed at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough for the 2026 FIFA World Cup has been removed, per Caleb Pongratz, via Dov Kleiman on X, with the stadium returning to artificial turf ahead of the 2026 NFL season.
The field hosted seven World Cup matches before the removal.
The NFLPA issued a pointed statement the moment the contrast became undeniable.
"The temporary installation of natural grass fields for the World Cup is a choice by certain NFL team owners to do for soccer players what they refuse to do for NFL players," the union said.
"It's no longer a question of capability: the technology exists, the expertise exists and the resources exist to install the high-level grass fields that our players overwhelmingly prefer.
We have seen the meaningful investments made to meet the standard for international athletes and global events.
NFL players who regularly compete on these fields, help fund these stadiums, and whose work makes the league what it is today deserve the same commitment to quality grass fields." The stadium hosted seven World Cup matches before the removal Gillette was one of at least five NFL venues that installed temporary natural grass for the tournament, as FIFA mandates natural surfaces at all its events.
The stadium had used artificial turf since November 2006, but its original 2002 construction included an irrigation system and underground heating infrastructure that made the conversion manageable.
Terrible: The natural grass surface installed at the Patriots Gillette Stadium for the 2026 FIFA World Cup has officially been removed.
Dov Kleiman (@NFL_DovKleiman) July 12, 2026 Back to artificial turf for the 2026 NFL season.
Player safety is not even a concern (via @CalebPongratz10) pic.twitter.com/L5cqRajI5O Field superintendent Ryan Bjorn said the installation process took six weeks, starting the day after the Patriots' Super Bowl send-off rally on February 1.
Patriots players welcomed the temporary change.
"Playing on grass is a lot less taxing on the knees and ankles and joints like that," running back Rhamondre Stevenson said, mentioning that feeling sore is pretty common after games on turf.
"Just speaking personally for myself, I love playing on grass," safety Brenden Schooler said.
"I think its got more give on it, doesnt hurt as bad when you fall.
When its freezing out, it doesnt cut you up as bad as turf does.
You dont have to worry about turf burn.
And I think from doing my own research and looking at data and stuff, I think turf you have the unfortunate thing that you kind of get caught up, and guys get rolled up on, and your knee gets, or ankle gets stuck.
And like I was saying, grass has got a little bit more give." The NFLPA separately polled 1,700 players and found 92 percent prefer natural grass over turf.
49ers tight end George Kittle said this month on the Pardon My Take podcast: "If you can put grass in MetLife and in SoFi, I think you could do that year-round if you really gave a shit." The NFL has pointed to its own injury data showing comparable rates between surfaces: 0.43 injuries per 100 plays on artificial turf and 0.42 on grass.
The NFLPA disputes the framing, citing a 28 percent higher rate of non-contact lower extremity injuries on turf and a 69 percent higher rate of non-contact foot and ankle injuries compared to natural surfaces.
The grass is now gone from Gillette.
The argument over why it could not stay is not.
More NFL news: - Dak Prescott gets positive George Pickens update before Cowboys camp - Cowboys' linebacker uncertainty has one obvious blockbuster solution sitting in Miami - Cowboys lack a proven one-on-one winner off the edge and training camp may expose that fast - Cowboys emerge as sudden favorites for $120M star amid 49ers standoff.