kcbd
A Lubbock judge has issued a temporary restraining order that prevents the NCAA from enforcing penalties against Texas Tech athlete Jamichael Stillwell, clearing the way for him to suit up for the Red Raiders, at least for now. The court determined that Stillwell has legal standing to challenge the NCAA's eligibility rules.
Stillwell, a forward, joined Texas Tech this year after several seasons of college basketball, most recently at Central Florida. He played during the 2022-2023 season, and many other athletes from that school year received an additional year of eligibility under the NCAA's so-called five-for-five rule.
On Friday, Stillwell filed a lawsuit against the NCAA in the 72nd District Court in Lubbock, seeking monetary damages exceeding $1 million along with other non-monetary relief. Judge John Grace granted the temporary restraining order the same day, finding that Stillwell should qualify for an extra year of eligibility just as other players did.
The suit alleges that the NCAA's attempt to block his eligibility constitutes a breach of its own contract. Judge Grace noted that Stillwell would lose out on an NIL deal if he is not permitted to practice or play. The court is scheduled to hear arguments in the case on Nov. 20.
The temporary restraining order makes Stillwell eligible for No. 19 Texas Tech's game against No. 3 Illinois in Lubbock on Tuesday. The Red Raiders opened their season just a few days ago against Jackson State and currently hold a 2-0 record.
Stillwell's legal team argues that every game he misses represents an opportunity that cannot be recovered. Earlier this year, Stillwell obtained an injunction in Georgia, but the NCAA secured a stay in that case, prompting him to seek another injunction in a different state.
Key Analysis
The ruling underscores the ongoing tension between athletes and the NCAA over eligibility rules, particularly the five-for-five provision. By granting the temporary restraining order, the court has prioritized Stillwell's immediate ability to compete and protect his NIL interests, while the broader legal questions await a Nov. 20 hearing. The case also highlights the strategic use of state courts by athletes seeking relief after unfavorable rulings elsewhere.
Originally reported by kcbd.