No, the NFL is not racist because black men are tackled more often in the NFL

T.Here are people desperate to see racism in everything that simply makes up where it doesn’t exist.For “articles” published by Scientific American Last week, he claimed that “football violence disproportionately affects black men.” In a sport that is violent and played predominantly by black men, the logical response to this ridiculous claim is “do you think so?”

A lot of people just try to indulge black people, and “Damar Hamlin’s Collapse Highlights the Violence Black Men Experience in Football” is one example. It’s a claim so illogical that you can justifiably assume it’s parody or satire, until you realize the author is an assistant professor at Duke University. Instead, it reflects the toxic absurdity currently ruling intellectuals and academia, and the pathetic and desperate need to classify everything that negatively affects black people as a result of some form of racism. I’m here.

Liberal journalists want you to hate football

The article asserts, “Although this form of entertainment has been normalized, Hamlin’s injuries demonstrate that ordinary violence can have deadly consequences, and that black men’s athletic labor can have fatal consequences.” It highlights how we support this brutal system.”

Dr. Tracy Canada The author of this article, I respect the work she has done in her career and the efforts she made to complete her PhD. Please excuse my lack of sophistication. But this article is probably one of her most nonsensical things ever written.

Canada’s premise is basically that black players get injured more often because “non-white players make up 70% of the NFL.” But why would Canada think otherwise? Why anyone? What did she expect from her 7-to-1 ratio of non-white players to white players?Next, the injuries of two black players were classified as black-on-black crime. Are there accusations?

Additionally, Canada has accused the NFL of “racial stacking,” which she described as a process of “racially segregating players by playing position,” resulting in “black people in play.” It puts athletes at higher risk”. So what’s the point here? Does Canada Want More White Players Playing Soccer? For literally decades people like social justice enthusiast Dr. Is there an argument now that there are too many black athletes and the result of this surplus is a strange form of systemic racism?

Canada is clearly not a serious person, nor would anyone put forward such outlandish theories. I need to start.

Not surprisingly (and thankfully), NFL Hall of Fame coach Tony Dungey refuted Canada’s ridiculous claims.

“As a black and former NFL player, I can tell you this article is absolutely ridiculous,” said Dungey. murmured.

Click here to read more about the Washington Examiner

Dungy’s sentiment reflects common sense in times of absolute madness. Blacks and whites get hurt playing football. Some of them are very serious. However, all players play the game voluntarily and are not forced to do so. The risk of injury in sports is well known.

Black people have experienced many injustices throughout history, from when their African ancestors captured them, enslaved them, and sold them to slave traders, to the horrific acts of discrimination they experienced during Jim Crow. Paying millions of black men to play happily is not one of those things that some of them get hurt. Anyone who claims otherwise should be taken seriously Rather, such thoughts should be immediately discredited.