[ad_1]
Of the five people banned from sports betting on sites operated by the Connecticut Lottery, at least four were for using more than one machine at a time or betting “just under” the kiosk’s limits. Shows document obtained by CT Insider that it has been completely or partially banned.
But the lottery, which operates sports betting in Connecticut since it was legalized in 2021, claims these practices are prohibited, but officials have questioned where the relevant rules are written. , or failed to explain the reason behind it.
Last month, CT Insider reported on a Yale medical student named Ickley who was one of five banned gamblers. He made thousands of dollars in sports betting in Connecticut, but he was banned for life after lottery officials accused him of betting on behalf of others. , which he denied, not only did he use multiple machines at once and bet just under the kiosk limit.
Lee appealed his ban, claiming the rule in question was not recorded anywhere and blaming the lottery that targeted him for his betting success (authorities denied this accusation). Lee told CT Insider on Friday that the lottery had cut his lifetime ban on appeal to 20 years, but said he continues to view the punishment as unjust.
Documents now obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request reveal that the lottery banned several other bettors in similar circumstances. Three people in one received nearly identical letters in May informing them that they were caught on surveillance footage using multiple gambling kiosks at once to place bets just below the limit and were therefore banned. bottom. From his nine sportsbooks run by the lottery for a lifetime.
Another bettor who says he didn’t find a lottery ticket is also permanently banned. A spokesperson for the lottery said it could not share details about this last case until the bettor was formally notified of his ban.CT Insider has contacted each of the banned bettors. I tried, but I couldn’t find them or received a response, except for Lee.
In December, I was asked where the rules were written against using multiple machines and betting just under kiosk limits.
“A typical bet goes something like this: someone walks up to the kiosk, puts in money, places a wager, takes the betting slip and walks away,” says Smith. “When people aren’t behaving normally, we turn our attention to looking more closely at things, engaging with them, and monitoring their activities.”
Tara Chozet, a spokeswoman for CT Lottery, echoed Smith’s position when asked again this week to explain why it would ban betting from using multiple machines and betting below the kiosk limit.
“If betting activity does not appear normal, the [Connecticut Lottery Corporation] As we have done in these cases, we will investigate further,” Chosette wrote in an email.
Lee said CT Lottery and its partner PlaySugarHouse Sportsbook should be more transparent about their rules, and failing to do so is punishing his betting success by banning him anyway. Claims to impress. Declan Hill, a sports betting expert at the University of New Haven, similarly questioned why lotteries are banned for using multiple kiosks and betting below limits.
“You can plunder the longtime losers, but you have to give the winners a chance,” Hill said.
Chozet declined to provide further details about the circumstances that led to the five bans.
So far, Lee is the only banned bettor to formally challenge his suspension. Mr Chozet said one of his four other banned bettors had also requested an appeal, but “did not respond to our communications after that.”
The five banned bettors are banned from locations operated by CT Lottery, but are still allowed to gamble online or at Tribal Casino in Connecticut.
[ad_2]
Source link
